Non-locality and Entanglement
Einstein called non-locality “spooky action at a distance”. He was concerned that the early founders of quantum mechanics were
attributing the effects we see in the manifested, material world to be initiated by non-local causes, meaning that they were not measurable in the
physical realm. Einstein’s entire argument against non-local causes involves a condition known as entanglement.
To show that quantum theory was incomplete, he asked two fellow physicists to help devise a thought experiment which later became
famously known as the EPR Paradox. In it was theorized that when a particle goes through beta decay, two new particles were produced. Because they
have interacted with one another, they are considered to be entangled. Those two particles are sent away from each other in either a straight line
or at right angles. When the spin of both are measured, a table of results can be created showing that they are correlated in some direct manner.
Einstein suggested that the only way for this to happen was that some force traveled between particle A and B, delivering the necessary information
for B to drop into the appropriate state in correlation to the state of A after A had been measured.
Here’s the catch which Einstein pointed out. A force can only travel at the speed of light and can only go so far between each particle.
This means that the short range of the force’s furthermost reach can be traversed at the speed of light in what amounts to no time, or instantaneously. If
the distance between the particles is increased, no force can travel that far so as to instantaneously affect the other particle.
Here’s another way to think about this concept. A large building contains a very powerful electromagnet. When it is turned on, nearby
metallic objects will fly toward it. But, the magnet’s field can only affect objects within a certain distance. It doesn’t affect the cars outside the
building in the parking lot. If it could affect the cars at the same time and in the same way as nearby metal objects, some outside hidden force or information
would have to travel faster than the speed of light out to the parking lot. In quantum theory, this influence is called a “hidden variable”. Einstein wanted
to show that no such spooky thing existed.
Later, physicist John Bell developed a matrix, or a table, showing every combination of detection at every combination of angle alignment
of the two detectors and compared it to a table showing classically measured results (those with only local causes). The table showed that the quantum theory
of hidden variables produced more accurate predictions than did the table of classical measurements. This was experimentally proved in 1982 by physicist Alan Aspect.
Some physicists also interpreted this experiment to mean that faster-than-light travel might also be possible. The type of correlation referred
to in Bell’s Theorem was called entanglement in a 1935 paper written by Edwin Schrödinger.
The metaphysical and epistemological implications of this idea are staggering. What is chosen for one system affects all other systems that are
entangled with it. Of this, Schrödinger went on to say,
“It is rather discomforting that the theory should allow a system to be steered or piloted into one or the other type of state at the experimenter’s
mercy in spite of his having no access to it”.
This leads back to the philosophical implications of free will versus determinism, which is often entangled with the human philosophical implications
of the same topics. Later, Schrödinger’s original idea of this reality has been expanded to include all experiential reality including that of the mind and soul,
which Schrödinger never meant to address. As Heisenberg pointed out, philosophical arguments cannot altogether be avoided and good physics can be spoiled by poor philosophy.
Scientific theories and discoveries such as entanglement don’t actually prove anything. They provide models and frameworks of understanding. They beg us
to ask the question, “Do the laws that describe the physical realm also apply to any non-physical realm?” Many intuitives might argue that this is a bogus question to begin
with. They might assert that the laws of the non-physical realm are what create and sustain what we perceive as the physical realm. Unfortunately, science needs something
to measure to study a thing at all. Since the advent of quantum theory, some physicists have come to the same realization that every mystic has always espoused, which is
that the act of measurement is the limit of science, but not the limit of reality.
Do you experience “spooky action at a distance” that seems to imply the transfer of information outside the physical realm? Is there a boundary beyond
which science can never measure but some information from it still influences our material realm?
Some content excerpted from The Sage Age – Blending Science with Intuitive Wisdom
© 2008 MaAnna Stephenson
Content may be used freely with proper credit and a link to